From a foreign policy perspective, states attempt to change their environment in accordance with aims and objectives they have set for themselves. From a structural perspective, states attempt to adapt to their environment, making the best of the cards the system has dealt them. Either way, states are agents; they act in the world. How? What is the nature of diplomacy or ‘statecraft’ – a slightly old-world term that has recently been given a new lease of life? The best discussion of this topic is still that of David Baldwin (1985: 13), who produces a four-way taxonomy of the techniques of statecraft that provides a useful starting point for this discussion. He defines propaganda as ‘influence attempts relying primarily on the deliberate manipulation of verbal symbols’; diplomacy refers to ‘influence attempts relying primarily on negotiation’; economic statecraft covers ‘influence attempts relying on resources which have a reasonable semblance of a market price in terms of money’; and military statecraft refers to ‘influence attempts relying primarily on violence, weapons, or force’. The rest of this chapter examines the questions raised (or in some cases, avoided) by Baldwin’s classification.
Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book
Please log in to get access to this content
- Power and Security
- Macmillan Education UK
- Sequence number
- Chapter number