’setting the record straight’ is for quite a few historians the rationale for their work. Others speak of demonstrating ‘that’s not how it was’. Whatever the expression, criticism of prevailing knowledge is the absolutely essential element of a historian’s work. If the findings do not demonstrate that something is contrary to what was claimed or was believed to have been the case the research project does not make sense.
Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
- The Politics of History
- Macmillan Education UK
- Sequence number
- Chapter number